After a year in office the Biden administration has given no indication that it intends to lower or eliminate the Section 301 additional tariffs the U.S. continues to impose on hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of imported goods from China. However, there are a number of proven and legitimate ways for importers, exporters, and manufacturers to effectively escape or limit the impact of these tariffs. A bit of flexibility and ingenuity can have a profound impact on a company’s bottom line when facing substantial duty exposure.
Exclusions. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative has closed the comment period on extending hundreds of previously expired Section 301 tariff exclusions and a decision could come in the next few weeks. In the meantime, ST&R is pressing USTR for a full reopening of the exclusion process and a renewal of previously expired exclusions. For more information, or to become part of this effort, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
In addition, importers can still join a court case challenging the Section 301 tariffs on List 3 and 4A goods from China and preserve their right to potential refunds of those tariffs. Contact attorneys Larry Ordet, Lenny Feldman, Rob DeCamp, or David Cohen at 301Litigation@strtrade.com to learn more.
Tariff Engineering. As much as U.S. Customs and Border Protection has resisted the idea in the past, the courts have continually affirmed that CBP can only levy tariffs on goods in their condition as imported. This has led importers in a variety of industries where high duties prevail to import products in unfinished or embellished forms to legally take advantage of classification provisions carrying a lower or free rate of duty. For instance, components imported separately may fall into an entirely different tariff provision than the finished product and may thus be excluded from a higher tariff.
Further, classification concepts are particularly useful for certain U.S. or other products that fall within the special HTSUS Chapter 98 provisions, many of which may enable importers to partially or fully avoid Section 301 tariffs. These provisions cover numerous types of products used for specific purposes as well as specific production or sourcing scenarios involving U.S. or previously imported components.
Operational Engineering. If you cannot modify the tariff classification of an imported product, explore changing its country of origin. For instance, CBP has found that the complex assembly of numerous parts, modules, or subassemblies into dedicated machines results in a substantial transformation of the components so that their country of origin is where the finished product was produced. Shifting operations away from China to another country may thus enable you to escape the higher duties.
Valuation. First sale valuation has long proven useful to industries that have been subject to high duties. Here duty is paid on the price a trading company pays the manufacturer instead of the higher price the importer pays the trading company. While additional tariffs still apply in this scenario, the dutiable value is significantly lower, resulting in a lower duty bill.
Various criteria must be met to ensure the first sale price reflects a sale that is clearly destined to the U.S. and conducted at arm’s length, but, once validated, a viable first sale value can provide substantial duty savings. It can also serve as a type of long-term annuity; i.e., even once the Section 301 tariffs expire, use of first sale valuation would continue to provide a lower declared value and thus reduce the regular duties assessed on a company’s products.
For more information on first sale, please contact Mark Segrist or Mark Tallo.
Importers should also examine whether certain amounts typically included in the price, such as buying commissions, shipping-related charges, inspection fees, and post-importation assembly charges, can be excluded from dutiable value.
Finally, importers should consider how the use of transfer pricing rules can lower dutiable value. Click here to learn more.
Bonded Facilities and Movements. For those companies involved in manufacturing as well as import for export trade, bonded facilities provide a safe haven from the Section 301 tariffs. Goods admitted to a foreign-trade zone in privileged foreign status retain their character and tariff classification as admitted even if they are manufactured into a product affected by the tariffs that may be withdrawn from the zone and exported out of the U.S. to avoid the tariffs. In addition, goods otherwise subject to the tariffs could be entered and stored in a bonded warehouse for up to five years to avoid those duties if they are (1) exported directly from the warehouse or (2) entered for U.S. consumption once the tariffs have lapsed or a product-specific exclusion has been granted. Temporary importation bonds and bonded movements also enable companies to avoid tariffs for products transiting or undergoing processing prior to exportation out of the U.S.
Section 321 De Minimis. CBP laws and regulations provide for a duty exemption for goods manifested at less than $800 fair retail value in the country of shipment if imported by one person on one day. CBP has confirmed that this exemption applies to Section 301 tariffs.
In assessing this opportunity, however, companies should carefully consider the accuracy of the information provided for such de minimis shipments to avoid cargo holds and possible seizures due to other government agency or intellectual property compliance issues. There is also a possibility that Congress may take action this year to limit the applicability of Section 321 to any goods subject to Section 301 tariffs or other trade remedy actions.
For more information on any of these strategies, please contact attorney Lenny Feldman at (305) 894-1011 or via email.
Copyright © 2022 Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A.; WorldTrade Interactive, Inc. All rights reserved.