Background

The members of the Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity – more than two dozen economies that together account for more than half of global steel imports – recently pledged to take further action against global excess steel production capacity.

Asserting that “the global steel industry is in a crisis due to challenges resulting from persistent excess capacity and production that are driven principally by non-market policies and practices that originate outside the GFSEC membership,” the member countries announced a comprehensive framework for joint action that includes the following measures they intend to take (although “the level of ambition” of specific actions taken may vary among members).

Trade data – examining opportunities to develop or enhance public steel import monitoring systems, exchanging trade and other relevant data to identify suspicious patterns of trade involving steel products originating from non-members, and helping develop or improve monitoring systems

Trade remedies – addressing the market distortive effects of steel excess capacity by (1) undertaking antidumping duty, countervailing duty, and global safeguard investigations, including possible self-initiation, (2) applying other trade measures on imports of steel and derivative products containing steel from sources of global excess capacity, (3) coordinating to detect and address circumvention of trade measures in the steel sector, and (4) collaborating on each other’s trade actions that address market-distorting government support measures, including by monitoring trade diversion and considering appropriate responses

Export restrictions – assessing the extent to which non-members are imposing export restrictions on steelmaking raw materials, analyzing their impact on excess capacity, and considering whether to take measures in response

Subsidies – reducing and eliminating market-distorting subsidies and other support measures by government or government-related entities that contribute to persistent global excess

capacity in the steel sector

Other – considering how to assess the impact on steel excess capacity of weak regulation and enforcement that unfairly lower production costs, with a view to determining whether future action may be appropriate

Copyright © 2026 Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A.; WorldTrade Interactive, Inc. All rights reserved.

ST&R: International Trade Law & Policy

Since 1977, we have set the standard for international trade lawyers and consultants, providing comprehensive and effective customs, import and export services to clients worldwide.

View Our Services 

Close

Cookie Consent

We have updated our Privacy Policy relating to our use of cookies on our website and the sharing of information. By continuing to use our website or subscribe to our publications, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.