Tariffs imposed by President Trump this year under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act were struck down again Aug. 29 when the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a 7-4 decision upholding a Court of International Trade ruling. However, the tariffs continue to be assessed on subject imports while the litigation is ongoing.
The CAFC affirmed the CIT’s holding that the “reciprocal” and trafficking-related tariffs imposed this year under IEEPA are “unbounded in scope, amount, and duration” and therefore exceed the authority that law delegates to the president. The CAFC did not decide the broader issue of whether tariffs may be imposed under IEEPA at all; a federal district court ruled earlier this year that they may not, and one CAFC justice in the current case agreed. Even so, the majority opinion discussed this issue at length and appeared skeptical that the term “regulate” in IEEPA necessarily includes the power to impose tariffs, as the government argued.
In light of a recent Supreme Court decision on the legality of nationwide injunctions, the CAFC vacated the CIT’s injunction prohibiting the federal government from collecting the IEEPA tariffs on all imports (not just those made by the plaintiffs to this case) and mandated that the case be sent back to the CIT to reconsider whether an injunction is appropriate and, if so, how broadly it should be applied. The CAFC then essentially paused this remand until Oct. 14 to give the parties to the case the chance to first ask the Supreme Court to address the merits and/or the CAFC’s decision on the injunction.
Importers should continue to monitor the liquidation of entries where IEEPA tariffs were paid to ensure their rights to potential tariff refunds are not lost, extending liquidations where possible and protesting if entries are liquidated. For further details, please find STR's guidance here.
If your company has entries subject to IEEPA tariffs that have liquidated, or if you have other questions about this litigation and its impact on your business, please contact an ST&R professional or email us at tariffs@strtrade.com.
Copyright © 2026 Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A.; WorldTrade Interactive, Inc. All rights reserved.
Related Trade Report Articles
- October 22, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
Section 338 Tariffs on Imports from Canada Challenged in Court
Duty Savings, Tariff Mitigation & Supply Chain Efficiencies, Customs & International Trade Settlement / Litigation
- August 19, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
Court Upholds President’s Elimination of De Minimis Exemption for Imports
Litigation & Dispute Resolution, Customs & International Trade Settlement / Litigation
- August 11, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
CAFC Upholds Classification of Luxury Watches in Higher Duty Provision
Customs & Import Compliance, Tariff Classification, Litigation & Dispute Resolution, Customs & International Trade Settlement / Litigation
- July 31, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
Section 301 Forced Labor Tariffs Challenged in New Lawsuits
Duty Savings, Tariff Mitigation & Supply Chain Efficiencies, Section 232, 301 & Other Trade Remedy Tariff Exclusion Opportunities, Litigation & Dispute Resolution, Customs & International Trade Settlement / Litigation
- July 17, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
File a Lawsuit Now to Secure IEEPA Tariff Refunds on Liquidated Entries
Litigation & Dispute Resolution, Customs & International Trade Settlement / Litigation
- June 16, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
Section 122 Tariff Remains in Place Following Appeals Court Ruling
Litigation & Dispute Resolution, Customs & International Trade Settlement / Litigation