In a Feb. 21 memorandum President Trump threatened to impose import tariffs in response to a wide range of burdens imposed by foreign governments on U.S. companies.
The memo states that the Trump administration’s policy will be to act via tariffs or other actions when a foreign government “imposes a fine, penalty, tax, or other burden that is discriminatory, disproportionate, or designed to transfer significant funds or intellectual property from American companies to the foreign government or the foreign government’s favored domestic entities.” Specifically, the administration will consider (1) taxes imposed on U.S. companies by foreign governments, including those that may discriminate against U.S. companies, (2) regulations imposed on U.S. companies by foreign governments that could inhibit the growth or intended operation of U.S. companies, (3) any act, policy, or practice of a foreign government that could require a U.S. company to jeopardize its intellectual property, and (4) any other act, policy, or practice of a foreign government that serves to undermine the global competitiveness of U.S. companies.
The memo also directs federal agencies to take the following actions.
– The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative will determine whether to renew Section 301 investigations of the digital services taxes of France, Austria, Italy, Spain, Turkey, and the United Kingdom and, if a positive determination is made, will take “all appropriate and feasible action in response to those DSTs.” (Several years ago USTR proposed additional tariffs of up to 25 percent on $2.1 billion worth of imports from these countries after finding that their DSTs would discriminate against U.S. companies, but that proposal was suspended and ultimately terminated to facilitate the negotiation of a related agreement among members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.)
– USTR will also determine whether to (1) investigate the DST of any other country that may discriminate against U.S. companies or burden or restrict U.S. commerce, (2) pursue a panel under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement on the DST imposed by Canada, and (3) conduct a Section 301 investigation of Canada’s DST.
– USTR, together with the departments of Commerce and the Treasury, will (1) jointly identify trade and other regulatory practices by other countries (see numbered list above) that discriminate against, disproportionately affect, or otherwise undermine the global competitiveness or intended operation of U.S. companies in the digital economy and more generally, (2) investigate whether any act, policy, or practice of any country in the European Union or the United Kingdom has the effect of requiring or incentivizing the use or development of U.S. companies’ products or services in ways that undermine freedom of speech and political engagement or otherwise moderate content, and (3) recommend (as part of a USTR report required by April 1) appropriate actions to counter any such practices under applicable authorities.
– USTR will identify and report by April 1 on tools the U.S. can use to secure among trading partners a permanent moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions.
– USTR, in consultation with the DOC and the senior counselor to the president for trade and manufacturing, will establish a process that allows U.S. businesses to report foreign tax or regulatory practices that disproportionately harm U.S. companies.
– Treasury, in consultation with USTR and DOC, will (1) determine whether any foreign country subjects U.S. citizens or companies (including in the digital economy) to discriminatory or extraterritorial taxes or has any tax measure in place that otherwise undermines the global competitiveness of U.S. companies, is inconsistent with any U.S. tax treaty, or is otherwise actionable under any U.S. tax-related legal authority and (2) include its determination in a report due by April 1 regarding the OECD agreement.
ST&R offers a three-pronged strategy to avoid, mitigate, and/or recover tariffs on imported goods. Click here for more information.
Copyright © 2026 Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A.; WorldTrade Interactive, Inc. All rights reserved.
Related Trade Report Articles
- October 30, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
No Section 232 Tariffs on Robotics and Industrial Machinery
Duty Savings, Tariff Mitigation & Supply Chain Efficiencies, Section 232 National Security Proceedings
- October 28, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
No Section 232 Tariffs for Now on Imports of Wind Turbines
Duty Savings, Tariff Mitigation & Supply Chain Efficiencies, Section 232 National Security Proceedings
- October 27, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
List of Canadian Goods Subject to Section 338 Tariff Modified
Duty Savings, Tariff Mitigation & Supply Chain Efficiencies
- October 27, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
Further Suspension of China Ship Fees, Crane Tariffs Considered
Duty Savings, Tariff Mitigation & Supply Chain Efficiencies, Section 301 Unfair Trade Practice Proceedings
- October 23, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
USDA to Play Role in Preferential Tariff Treatment for Apparel Imports
Duty Savings, Tariff Mitigation & Supply Chain Efficiencies, Textile & Apparel
- October 22, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
Section 338 Tariffs on Imports from Canada Challenged in Court
Duty Savings, Tariff Mitigation & Supply Chain Efficiencies, Customs & International Trade Settlement / Litigation