There are a number of duty savings strategies companies can use to conserve cash, lower customs duties and tariffs, and seek refunds. These strategies are always a high priority for businesses involved in international trade, but particularly so in today's volatile global environment.
Transfer pricing represents the price one company charges a related company for its goods and services. Most countries have transfer pricing rules that employ the arm’s length principle, which generally requires that the prices of such transactions to not be influenced by the relationship between the companies. Many companies adjust their intercompany prices on a periodic basis to maintain arm’s length pricing for business, tax, and customs valuation purposes and avoid potentially serious penalties by tax and customs authorities.
Retroactive transfer pricing adjustments are generally considered part of the customs value of previously imported goods and may need to be reported to CBP. In such cases, importers may need to tender additional duties to CBP if the adjustment increases the customs value of the imported goods, but they may also seek a refund for adjustments that decrease that value and thus the duties owed.
To lawfully do so, however, importers must be participating in CBP’s reconciliation program, which allows importers to flag the import entries; declare an initial, temporary value at the time of entry; and complete or reconcile such entries no later than 21 months after importation. Importers must also have a pre-existing formula for determining the value of downward adjustments and satisfy the related-party arm’s length pricing requirements in 19 CFR Part 152 prior to import.
Utilizing CBP’s reconciliation program and ensuring that their related-party prices meet CBP’s requirements not only permit companies to take advantage of any retroactive transfer price adjustments by reducing previously declared dutiable values, thereby lowering duty liability, but they also help provide much needed liquidity. Further, they help reduce the risk of penalties or other sanctions that could result from noncompliance with customs rules and regulations. Those penalties can be significant – between 200 and 800 percent of the loss of revenue – so coordinated transfer pricing is vitally important, especially at a time when tariffs are increasing for many importers.
Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., specializes in helping companies maximize duty savings through a variety of programs and initiatives. If you feel your company can benefit from such savings, please contact customs attorneys Charles Crowley, Mark Segrist, or Lou Shoichet to learn more.
Copyright © 2026 Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A.; WorldTrade Interactive, Inc. All rights reserved.
Related Trade Report Articles
- October 23, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
USDA to Play Role in Preferential Tariff Treatment for Apparel Imports
Duty Savings, Tariff Mitigation & Supply Chain Efficiencies, Textile & Apparel
- October 22, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
Section 338 Tariffs on Imports from Canada Challenged in Court
Duty Savings, Tariff Mitigation & Supply Chain Efficiencies, Customs & International Trade Settlement / Litigation
- October 15, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
Mitigating Tariffs – Your Three-Pronged Strategy
Duty Savings, Tariff Mitigation & Supply Chain Efficiencies
- October 8, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
Section 301 Tariffs on Imports from China Officially Continued
Duty Savings, Tariff Mitigation & Supply Chain Efficiencies, Section 232, 301 & Other Trade Remedy Tariff Exclusion Opportunities
- September 24, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
Drug Products Exempt from Section 232 Tariffs Defined
Duty Savings, Tariff Mitigation & Supply Chain Efficiencies, Section 232, 301 & Other Trade Remedy Tariff Exclusion Opportunities, Life Sciences
- September 18, 2026 | Trade Report Learn More
Congress Approves New Tariff Authority
Duty Savings, Tariff Mitigation & Supply Chain Efficiencies