Interested parties have only one more week to submit comments to the International Trade Commission on petitions seeking duty suspensions or reductions under the miscellaneous trade bill process revised and reinstated by the American Manufacturing Competitiveness Act of 2016. All such petitions timely filed with the ITC are available here.

The ITC is particularly interested in comments from domestic producers on (1) whether they produce an article that is identical to, like, or directly competitive with an article named in a petition and (2) if they do, whether they object to the petition. The ITC is also interested in comments from individuals and entities who believe they would be a likely beneficiary of a particular duty suspension or reduction or who, having been named in a petition or another comment as a likely beneficiary, wish to state that they would not be a likely beneficiary.

Comments on these petitions may only be filed electronically via the ITC’s designated secure web portal and in the format designated in that portal. Commenters must be prepared to complete their entire comment when they enter the portal, which will not allow them to edit, amend, or complete the comment at a later time.

Following the comment period the ITC will submit preliminary (in June) and final (in August) reports to the House Ways and Means and Senate Finance committees on the petitions received. The reports will include the ITC’s analysis and recommendations regarding each petition, including whether there is domestic production of the article, whether the estimated loss in revenues due to the duty suspension or reduction exceeds $500,000, and whether the duty suspension or reduction will be available to any person importing the article.

The ITC is required to classify the petitions into categories based on whether (1) the petition meets the requirements for inclusion in an MTB, (2) the ITC recommends inclusion in an MTB with specified technical changes, changes in product scope, or adjustment in the amount of duty reduction, (3) the ITC recommends against inclusion in an MTB because the petition does not meet the requirements or the petitioner is not a likely beneficiary, and (4) the ITC otherwise recommends not including the petition. Congress will make the final decision regarding the imported articles to be included in an MTB.

For more information on submitting comments or other aspects of the MTB process, please contact David Olave at (202) 730-4960.


Cookie Consent

We use cookies on our website. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.