COVID-19 Trade Impacts Resource Page
Visit our COVID-19 Trade Impacts Resource Page for information on the effects the COVID-19 pandemic is having on trade operations, worldwide import/export changes, and how companies can respond.
Tariff Actions Resource Page
Visit our Tariff Actions Resource Page for information, deadlines and resource documents on the various U.S. tariff actions and the responses by the rest of the world.
ST&R Podcast: Two Minutes in Trade
We interpret the latest trade news to help you understand the impact on your business. Listen to the latest episode.
Trade Report Contact:
Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg Trade Report
Click here to learn more about the Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg Trade Report.
For FY 2018, which starts Oct. 1, the FDA is increasing this fee from $3,382 to $4,624. There are no fee waivers or reductions for small establishments, businesses, or groups.
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said the U.S. is looking to make “substantial improvements” to the KORUS agreement but Korean Trade Minister Kim Hyun-chong said Seoul “did not agree” to the “unilateral” U.S. proposal to renegotiate.
As of Sept. 16, non-ABI entry summary, duty deferral, e214 (electronic foreign-trade zone application), manufacturer ID creation, and importer security filing will be deployed in ACE and will no longer be supported in the Automated Commercial System.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative has initiated a Section 301 investigation of China’s acts, policies, and practices related to technology transfer, intellectual property, and innovation. While the practices to be examined in this investigation will be specific, any potential relief (e.g., additional tariffs or import restrictions) could be imposed on a broader basis. As a result, any company doing business with China should participate in this investigation to ensure that its interests are protected.
At the conclusion of their first round of talks on modernizing NAFTA, the U.S., Canada, and Mexico committed to “an accelerated and comprehensive negotiation process” but warned that “a great deal of effort and negotiation will be required in the coming months.” The three partners are aiming to conclude negotiations by early 2018, but some observers say that timeframe may not be sufficient to address the substantial changes to the agreement that the U.S. is seeking.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection has announced its first-ever final determination in an antidumping duty evasion investigation under the Enforce and Protect Act and advanced several associated proceedings, all covering steel wire hangers from China. A CBP press release states that these investigations have resulted in CBP preventing the evasion of over $33 million dollars in AD duties annually.
As part of its effort to improve U.S. manufacturers’ and suppliers’ access to domestic and foreign government procurement markets, the Trump administration is seeking public input by Sept. 18 on how that access is affected by the government procurement obligations in U.S. free trade agreements and the World Trade Organization Agreement on Government Procurement.
A Trump administration review of steel has been pushed back but is still underway and could yet lead to broad import restrictions, according to press sources.
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said at the launch of negotiations to revamp NAFTA Aug. 16 that President Trump “is not interested in a mere tweaking of a few provisions and a couple of updated chapters” but instead will seek “major improvements.” Lighthizer said this task will be “very difficult” but expressed hope that the end result will be “freer markets, fairer and balanced trade, and stronger ties between our three countries.”
President Trump has directed the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative to determine whether to conduct a Section 301 investigation of any of China's laws, policies, practices, or actions that may be unreasonable or discriminatory and that may be harming U.S. intellectual property rights, innovation, or technology development. Any such investigation could ultimately result in additional tariffs or restrictions on imports from China or other measures.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection is revising its ongoing tests evaluating the feasibility and functionality of filing air, rail, and vessel cargo export manifest data electronically through the Automated Commercial Environment.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative has initiated its annual review of the products and countries eligible for duty-free treatment under GSP and is accepting petitions seeking to add, preserve, or remove GSP benefits.
An Aug. 8 report from the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission finds that the U.S. faces challenges in identifying and preventing the entry of goods imported from China that are produced with forced labor despite a 2015 law that enhanced U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s authorities in this area.
The Trump administration is reportedly considering self-initiating a Section 301 investigation of China’s forced technology transfer policies. However, the administration has reportedly postponed further action due to its efforts to secure China’s help in imposing tougher economic sanctions against North Korea.