COVID-19 Trade Impacts Resource Page
Visit our COVID-19 Trade Impacts Resource Page for information on the effects the COVID-19 pandemic is having on trade operations, worldwide import/export changes, and how companies can respond.
Tariff Actions Resource Page
Visit our Tariff Actions Resource Page for information, deadlines and resource documents on the various U.S. tariff actions and the responses by the rest of the world.
ST&R Podcast: Two Minutes in Trade
We interpret the latest trade news to help you understand the impact on your business. Listen to the latest episode.
Trade Report Contact:
Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg Trade Report
Click here to learn more about the Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg Trade Report.
Recently updated guidelines from U.S. Customs and Border Protection will make it more expensive to secure a return of goods seized for violations of U.S. export laws or regulations. However, export compliance programs and other factors can help lower that cost.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection sources state that CBP’s next customs broker license examination has been moved from Oct. 23 to Oct. 17. CBP states that registration for the exam will open in mid-August.
The U.S. and China have each taken additional trade measures against each other in recent days, further dimming prospects for the conclusion of a bilateral trade agreement. There is also increasing concern that, due to these and other factors, the tariffs each has imposed on imports from the other could remain in effect for the foreseeable future. In this environment companies engaged in U.S.-China trade should consider ways to minimize their costs and maximize certainty regarding their operations.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection should review and update its policies for inspecting commercial vehicles at land border ports of entry and analyze noncompliance at individual POEs to better identify and address deficiencies, according to a new report from the Government Accountability Office. The Department of Homeland Security said it agreed with the recommendations and has initiated procedures to implement them.
Just a week after announcing the first exclusions from the Section 301 additional 25 percent tariff for List 2 goods from China, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative has announced the first exclusions for List 3 goods as well. These exclusions cover 10 specially prepared product descriptions that reflect 15 exclusion requests. USTR is also continuing to accept exclusion requests for List 3 goods until Sept. 30.
Initial indications are that the 10 percent tariff, which would be in addition to any other applicable tariffs, will be applied on the entire list of 3,805 full and partial subheadings announced in May. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative said at that time that this list covers all apparel, footwear, and manufactured textile products, among others, but excludes pharmaceuticals, certain pharmaceutical inputs, select medical goods, rare earth materials, and critical minerals.
Hundreds more requests for exclusions from the Section 301 25 percent additional tariff on imports from China have recently been denied but there have been new approvals as well. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative is continuing to review outstanding exclusion requests for List 1 and List 2 goods, imports of which are collectively worth about $50 billion, and has set a Sept. 30 deadline for requests for List 3 goods, which are worth about $200 billion.
A new Trump administration policy seeks to prevent countries that meet certain economic and other indicators from utilizing flexibilities for developing countries in World Trade Organization rules and negotiations. China, the primary target of the new policy, denounced it as indicative of the United States’ “wayward arrogance and selfishness” and said it “will bring controversy and chaos, putting new obstacles in the way of WTO reforms.”
The first products excluded from the Section 301 additional 25 percent tariff on List 2 goods from China have been announced by the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. These exclusions cover 69 specially prepared product descriptions that reflect 292 exclusion requests.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection reports that there was a significant increase in its efforts to enforce trade remedies and other laws in 2018, highlighting some of the risk factors importers need to be aware of and the importance of taking compliance measures to mitigate them.
In a case argued successfully by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg attorneys, the Court of International Trade ruled recently that certain stringed light sets are properly classified as other electric lamps and lighting fittings under HTSUS 9405.40.8000 (3.9 percent duty) rather than as lighting sets of a kind used for Christmas trees under HTSUS 9405.30.0010 (8 percent duty).
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative is seeking comments by Aug. 30 on the operation of the Caribbean Basin Initiative (the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act as amended by the Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act). USTR will use this information to prepare its biannual report to Congress on the operation of these programs.
As the federal government expands the number of goods imported from China that are excluded from the 25 percent Section 301 tariffs, importers of such goods should take specific steps to maximize their refunds of those tariffs, says Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg customs attorney David Cohen. These include keeping a close eye on liquidation dates and the ever-changing list of excluded goods.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection has announced that starting Aug. 22 it will conduct an approximately one-year test under which additional data elements for Section 321 goods will be transmitted in advance of their arrival. CBP states that it is conducting this voluntary test to determine the feasibility of requiring advance data from different types of parties and requiring additional data that is generally not required under current regulations in order to effectively identify and target high-risk shipments in the e-commerce environment.
The World Trade Organization issued this week a mixed ruling in a long-running case challenging more than a dozen U.S. countervailing duty orders on imports from China. While the U.S. criticized the decision, press reports indicate that it could face retaliatory trade sanctions if it does not comply.
The Trump administration’s willingness to strike a trade deal with China is being seen by some observers as increasingly tied to how doing so may affect the president’s chances of winning the 2020 presidential election. An agreement that secures suitably strong terms for the U.S. could aid Trump’s re-election bid, but if that cannot be accomplished Trump could follow through with threats to hike tariffs on $300+ billion worth of additional imports from China as a show of strength to voters.
The U.S. is moving toward the imposition of higher import tariffs on a wide range of goods from the European Union due to several ongoing trade disputes, raising concerns among EU exporters about their access to an important market. However, the first sale rule is a proven tool that can be used to not only mitigate the impact of any such tariffs but also lower costs well into the future.
President Trump has declined to impose import restrictions on uranium despite a Department of Commerce determination that imports are threatening to impair national security.
Substantially increasing trade and investment between the U.S. and Africa is the goal of the Trump Administration’s new Prosper Africa initiative. Mark Green, administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development, said this initiative is “a new way of doing business” that “makes the full suite of U.S. government networks and resources available and accessible to importers, exporters, and investors.”