WorldTrade\INTERACTIVE
 ST&R/STTAS Home
 Client Advisories
 Seminars/Webinars
 About ST&R
 About STTAS

 Current Issue
 Printable Version
 Search Archives
 About WTI

 Federal Register
 Current Contents
 Archives

 Trade Activity
 Calendar
 All
 Current
 BIS
 CITA
 CBP
 DHS
 DOC
 FDA
 FTZB
 ITA
 ITC
 State
 Treasury
 USDA
 USTR

 Congressional
 Activities
 Hearings
 Legislation
Volume 16, Issue 56
Thursday, March 19, 2009
In this issue...

House, Senate Launch Efforts to Change Cuba Trade Policy
Efforts to ease trade with Cuba are beginning to move forward in Congress. Both the House and Senate took steps this week to expand bilateral commerce with the island nation, which has been under a U.S. embargo for over 40 years. Supporters say opening the Cuban market could provide a significant boost to the struggling U.S. economy.

In the Senate, a bipartisan group of 15 senators wrote to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner this week to oppose the continuation of a policy that has curtailed exports of agricultural and medical products to Cuba. The letter called on Geithner to reverse the recent action by Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, which they said runs contrary to the intent of Congress, as expressed in the fiscal year 2009 omnibus appropriations bill, to facilitate agricultural trade with Cuba.

In a March 11 notice, OFAC stated that the Cuba trade provisions in the omnibus bill “directed that none of the funds made available in [that bill] may be used to administer, implement, or enforce” a February 2005 regulatory amendment concerning the definition of “cash in advance,” one of the methods of payment for agricultural exports to Cuba allowed by the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000. This amendment stated that “cash in advance” should be given its ordinary commercial meaning, which requires payment to be received by the seller or the seller’s agent prior to the shipment of goods from the port at which they are loaded. OFAC stated last week that because the omnibus bill does not amend the TSRA language, those statutory provisions remain in place, implying that OFAC’s position will not change either.

However, the senators charged that the agency’s interpretation of the term “cash in advance” as requiring payment prior to the shipment of goods is legally inaccurate. The letter cited the American Law Division of the Congressional Research Service as saying that “it appears customary within the international trade and finance community to place the emphasis on the legal transfer of control, rather than on the date of shipment” and that “OFAC’s interpretation appears to limit the available payment options to those that are considered risky, undesirable, and underutilized.” The letter added that prior to OFAC’s regulatory change cash-based sales of agricultural products to Cuba “were taking place and working well,” with no reported instances of a Cuban buyer taking possession of U.S. goods prior to completing payment to the seller.

The letter called on Geithner to stand by a pledge he made during Senate consideration of his nomination earlier this year to take “great care to follow congressional intent … [and] to ensure that OFAC’s activities with regard to Cuba are achieving its important objectives without unnecessary hurdles or unreasonable administrative delays.” Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., added that he fully expects Geithner to “revisit this issue to get U.S.-Cuba relations back on track and get our Cuba policy right.”

Baucus said he plans to soon introduce legislation that would ease restrictions on travel to and payment from Cuba, but House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., beat him to the punch. On March 16 Rangel introduced three bills to increase economic engagement with Cuba, including one that would overturn OFAC’s interpretation of “payment of cash in advance.” That bill would also establish a government program to promote agricultural exports to Cuba and ease various requirements associated with travel to and doing business with Cuba.

Rangel also introduced a bill (H.R. 1530) that would eliminate the U.S. trade embargo completely within 60 days of its enactment. This bill asserts that the embargo is counterproductive because it adds “to the hardships of the Cuban people while making the United States the scapegoat for the failures of the communist system.” It also states that the best way to support democratic change in Cuba is by promoting trade and commerce, travel, communications and person-to-person exchanges, an approach the U.S is already using in other countries with similar governments.
Source Document 1...  Source Document 2...  Source Document 3...  Source Document 4... 

Subscribe

Unsubscribe

Subscription Agreement




Executive Editor: Shawn McCausland
Contact: smccausland@strtrade.com
1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 400
Washington, D.C. 20004
Tel: (202) 216-9307
Fax: (202) 842-2247

Circulation/User Registration/General Information/Advertising:
Director of Marketing
Contact: marketing@strtrade.com
1000 Northwest 57th Court, Suite 600
Miami, Florida 33126
Tel: (800) 5-TRADE-5 or (800) 587-2335 or (305) 267-9200
Fax: (305) 261-0403


World Trade\INTERACTIVE™ is an online international trade information service, published electronically by WorldTrade Interactive, Inc. It is prepared by the law firm of Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A. The publisher has taken all reasonable steps to verify the accuracy of the content of this site. However, WorldTrade Interactive, Inc., and Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions.

NOTE: Information contained herein is of necessity a summary of complicated and fact-specific issues. It is not intended to convey legal advice, and receipt of it does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship. Before you act on any information provided in this document, you should seek professional advice regarding its applicability to your specific circumstances.

Copyright © 2010 WorldTrade Interactive, Inc. - All Rights Reserved

Receipt of this free publication is allowed under the House and Senate gift rules.
See Senate Rule XXXV 1.(c)(9) and 1.(c)(19); House Rule XXV 5.(a)(3)(I) and 5(a)(3)(R)(i).

Sourcing at MAGIC - Aug 2010
Trade and Politics Blog
Import-Export Compliance Reviews - The SMART® Way
Export/Import Procedures and Documentation Book by Donna Bade
STRTAP - Sandler,Travis  & Rosenberg Trade Analysis Program
2010 Seminars
ACE E-Business Profile