News
Print PDF

Practice Areas

CBP Proposes to Modify Legal Responsibility for Importer Security Filing

Wednesday, July 06, 2016
Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg Trade Report

U.S. Customs and Border Protection is requesting comments no later than Sept. 6 on a proposed rule that would expand the definition of importer security filing importer for certain types of shipments so that the party that has the best access to the required information will be the party responsible for filing the ISF. CBP states that while this proposal would shift the legal responsibility for filing the ISF in these instances it would not change who actually submits the data in the “vast majority of cases.”

CBP regulations require ISF importers to transmit an ISF to CBP no later than 24 hours before the cargo is laden aboard a vessel destined to the U.S. (or any time prior to lading for foreign cargo remaining on board). The ISF consists of either ten data elements for shipments of goods intended to be entered into the U.S. or delivered to a foreign-trade zone or five data elements for shipments entirely of FROB cargo or goods intended to be transported as immediate exportation or transportation and exportation in-bond shipments.

Under current regulations, the ISF importer is the party causing goods to arrive within the limits of a port in the U.S. by vessel, typically the goods’ owner, purchaser or consignee or an agent such as a licensed customs broker. However, the regulations limit the definition of ISF importer for specified types of shipments: for FROB cargo, the ISF importer is the vessel-operating common carrier, and for IE and T&E in-bond shipments and goods to be delivered to an FTZ, the ISF importer is the party filing the IE, T&E or FTZ documentation.

CBP has concluded that these limitations do not reflect commercial reality and in some cases designate a party as the ISF importer even though it has no commercial interest in the shipment and limited access to the ISF data. In some cases, the party responsible may not even be involved in the importation at the time the ISF must be filed.

As a result, CBP is proposing to expand the definition of ISF importer to place responsibility for filing the ISF with the party causing the goods to enter the limits of a port in the U.S. and most likely to have access to the required ISF information. Specifically, for FROB shipments the ISF importer could be a non-vessel-operating common carrier as well as a VOCC, and for IE and T&E in-bond shipments and goods to be delivered to an FTZ the ISF importer could be the goods’ owner, purchaser, consignee or agent such as a licensed customs broker.

To get news like this in your inbox daily, subscribe to the Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg Trade Report.

Customs & International Headlines